Sources

Everything this site leans on

Listed so you can check it. Where scholars disagree, both sides are here — a bibliography that cited only the argument this site finds persuasive would be advocacy dressed as scholarship.

Dating the crucifixion — the case

  • Humphreys, C. & Waddington, W. G., "Dating the Crucifixion," Nature 306 (1983), 743–746. The original astronomical argument.
  • Humphreys, C. & Waddington, W. G., "The Jewish Calendar, a Lunar Eclipse and the Date of Christ's Crucifixion," Tyndale Bulletin 43.2 (1992), 331–351. The fuller case, and their defence against the visibility objection.
  • Humphreys, C., The Mystery of the Last Supper (Cambridge University Press, 2011). Book-length treatment, including his pre-exilic-calendar reconciliation of John against the synoptics. One proposal, not a consensus.

Dating the crucifixion — the objections

  • Schaefer, B. E., "Lunar Visibility and the Crucifixion," Quarterly Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society 31 (1990), 53–67. Argues the AD 33 eclipse would have been at most marginally perceptible: never more than ~59% of the disc shadowed, with light leakage washing out the reddening.
  • Gonzalez, G., "Reevaluating the Visibility of the April 3, AD 33, Lunar Eclipse from Jerusalem," Bibliotheca Sacra 179:713 (Jan–Mar 2022). Concludes the closing phase would have been visible under normal conditions, but that a khamsin most likely prevented it — removing a principal argument for AD 33.
  • Schaefer, B. E., "Lunar Crescent Visibility," QJRAS 37.4 (1996), 759–768. On how hard first sighting actually is to predict — the problem underneath every reconstruction on this site.

The Jewish calendar

  • Stern, S., Calendar and Community: A History of the Jewish Calendar, 2nd Century BCE – 10th Century CE (Oxford University Press, 2001). The standard history. Diversity before unity; no uniform intercalation as late as the sixth century; early lunar calendars running late, with Passover always after the equinox.
  • Talmud, Sanhedrin 11a–b. The pre-fixed criteria for declaring a leap year: equinox, ripeness of the barley, condition of the roads.
  • Encyclopaedia Judaica, "Calendar." Records the competing intercalation sequences that persisted into the tenth century.
  • Jewish Encyclopedia, "Calendar, History of." On Hillel II and the traditional date (~358–359 CE) for the fixed calculated calendar.

The Islamic calendar

  • Qur'an 9:36–37, with Tafsir al-Tabari and Tafsir Ibn Kathir on 9:37. The abolition of nasī', proclaimed at the Farewell Pilgrimage — the ruling that makes the Hijri year refuse to correct.

Roman and historical framing

  • Tacitus, Annals XV.44. Independent attestation of the execution under Pilate during Tiberius's reign.

The astronomy

  • Meeus, J., Astronomical Algorithms, 2nd ed. (Willmann-Bell, 1998). Ch. 49 for the new-moon series, ch. 25 for solar longitude. The engine implements these directly.
  • Espenak, F. & Meeus, J., polynomial expressions for ΔT (NASA Goddard Space Flight Center). The dynamical-to-universal time correction — nearly three hours at this epoch.
A note on how to read a bibliography like this one. The presence of a citation is not an endorsement of its conclusion, and the sources above contradict each other on purpose. Humphreys and Schaefer cannot both be right about what was visible over Jerusalem that evening. This site does not adjudicate between them; it shows you that the adjudication is still open.